Plainly

A reference site, not a course

AI, explained by level.
Nothing to sell you.

Almost everything that ranks for “learn AI” is an affiliate page pointing at a course. This site points at whatever is actually best, says when it's free, and tells you the date it was last checked so you know how much to trust it.

Last verified 11 August 2026  ·  Next scheduled review: September 2026

Pick where you actually are

The usual mistake is starting in the wrong place. People who just want to use these tools well get pushed into machine-learning theory and quit; people who want to build get handed prompt tips. Three honest tracks:


Three rules this site runs on

1. Every page is dated

AI content rots faster than anything else in tech. A guide written eight months ago can be confidently wrong about prices, limits, and which model to use. So every page here carries a last verified stamp, and pages that have gone stale say so rather than quietly misleading you. This is the whole reason the site exists: not to be the biggest, to be the one you can date-check. Every edit and correction is logged, dated, on the changes page, so the promise is checkable rather than just stated. The same method, turned on anything else you read: is what you're reading out of date?

2. Hard numbers live in one place

Context window sizes, prices, and model names change constantly. Rather than bury them in a hundred paragraphs that all rot separately, every number lives on a single Model facts page with its own date. The explainers teach the concept and link to the table for the figure. One page to maintain instead of a hundred to forget.

3. Free first, and no affiliate links

Where a free resource is as good as a paid one, the free one is listed first and the paid one is labelled. There are no affiliate links on this site, which is also why it will never recommend a $600 bootcamp that teaches what a free four-hour course covers better.

What we don't know, we say

Anywhere a figure couldn't be verified against a primary source, you'll see it flagged in orange rather than filled in with something plausible-looking. A confidently wrong number is worse than a visible gap, and “plausible-looking” is exactly what a language model produces when it doesn't know.

The terms everyone drops without explaining

Short, honest explainers for the vocabulary that gets used as though you already know it. Written to actually teach, not to rank.

Not sure which track? → Start here and answer three questions.